The Bill of Rights was created as an additional layer of protection against federal intrusion into state and citizen’s rights. The incorporation of the Bill of Rights (or incorporation for short) is the process by which American courts have applied portions of the U.S. Bill of Rights to the states. In the past, the Bill of Rights was held only to apply to the federal government. Our federal court system, however, has been applying the Federal Bill of Rights back against the states denying states their own historical rights. The states have their own charters of rights contained in their constitutions to protect their citizens from any state violations.
Article I, Section 9, Clause 2, of our Constitution says:
The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.
Privileges under the 14th Amendment are reserved for citizens not visitors, illegals or Guantanamo terrorists. If elected to Congress would you work diligently to stop giving the privileges reserved for citizens to those persons who are not citizens, especially those who are terrorists intent on destroying our nation?
U.S. Supreme Court said in MIRANDA v. ARIZONA, 384 U.S. 436 (1966):
(b) The privilege against self-incrimination, which has had a long and expansive historical development, is the essential mainstay of our adversary system and guarantees to the individual the "right to remain silent unless he chooses to speak in the unfettered exercise of his own will,…"
The requirement to be Mirandized prior to being questioned while in custody is a privilege set-aside for citizens. If elected to Congress would you work to assure that foreign Islamic terrorists while attacking or attempting to attack our nation and / or our citizens would be treated as enemy combatants operating outside of the Geneva Convention and would be questioned accordingly by our military or other national agencies?
The 14th Amendment says:
”All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the state wherein they reside.”
The Congressional Record of those who wrote this amendment, and also four years later in the Supreme Court case: Slaughterhouse Cases, 83 U.S. 16 Wall. 36 36 (1872), both stated that: “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” did not include people from foreign nations coming here having children who were loyal to their nation and subject to its authority. Women coming here from Mexico illegally and having children, now considered as citizens and anchor babies, is illegal because it is outside of the authority and against the original intent of the 14th Amendment.
If elected to Congress will you work diligently to see that this policy of anchor babies is overturned?